And now:Ish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

How Much Is Too Much? Officials Argue While Uranium Leaks

"There is nothing like radioactive material in their drinking water to make
the public upset," explains Mark Buehler, a Moab, Utah district water
quality director. He is referring to a huge pile of uranium mill tailings
750 feet away from the Colorado River at Moab. That's 10.5 million tons of
radioactive and toxic waste left over from 20 years of uranium processing
by the now-bankrupt Atlas Corporation, which ceased operations during 1984.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and Utah officials are arguing
about how much uranium -- a lot or an awful lot -- is leaking into both
groundwater and the river. The Colorado River supplies drinking water for
25 million people. Estimates set the cost at over $100 million to move the
waste pile to a plateau 18 miles away. Water treatment plants downstream
cannot remove the uranium, which has been proven to cause cancer. Even if
the pile is removed, toxic groundwater from under the waste pile will
continue flowing into the Colorado River. The NRC has approved the Atlas
plans to cover the pile with clay and rock. Utah representatives have
introduced parallel bills in the House to force the federal government to
excavate and move the waste. Joe Holonich of the NRC said that Lake Meade,
along the river's course, is big enough to dilute the radioactive water. He
claims that the leaking mill tailings adds "a sliver of uranium to a large
amount of uranium that's already in the river from upstream" uranium
deposits and abandoned mines. 


  Excessive Uranium Found In Worker's Bones Who Protested

"We turned the badges in and that was the last we heard of it," said Al
Puckett, a retired union shop steward who worked at the Paducah Gaseous
Diffusion Plant in Kentucky, "No one ever said anything to us." The Paducah
plant supplied radioactive fuel for nuclear bombs. Now long-overlooked
medical evidence shows that for some workers radiation doses were far
higher than previously believed and may have been dozens of times above the
federal limits. The exhumed bones of uranium worker Joseph Harding, who
died in 1980, offers the strongest corroboration to date of hazardous
conditions inside the plant, where workers labored for decades in a haze of
radioactive dust that was sometimes laced with plutonium. 

DOE Secretary Bill Richardson called Harding a "hero of the Cold War," but
for nine years before his death, Harding's claims of radiation exposure
were vigorously challenged by contractors (at that time, Union Carbide,
Martin Marietta, and Lockheed Martin) and DOE officials who insisted that
the plant was safe. Before his death, Harding developed stomach cancer,
lung perforations, and growths on his limbs. Harding had insisted that the
plant always had a dense fog of uranium dust and smoke that would cling to
workers' skin and coat their throats and teeth. A DOE study in 1981
attributed Harding's death to a combination of smoking and eating country
ham. A new study is also tracking death rates among workers at the K-25
plant in Oak Ridge where there is an unusually high rate of lung and bone
cancer among workers, as well as a third facility in Ohio. DOE admits it is
now clear that uranium workers were not properly protected until at least
1990. "This reaffirms our decision to get out of the business of fighting
sick workers," said David Michaels, DOE Assistant Secretary for EHS on Aug.
20. "Right now we should be bending over backward to help those workers."
(Washington Post, Aug. 22, 1999. For more radiation victim information go
to http://www.downwinders.org)
Reprinted under the Fair Use http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html doctrine 
of international copyright law.
            &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
           Tsonkwadiyonrat (We are ONE Spirit)
                      Unenh onhwa' Awayaton
                   http://www.tdi.net/ishgooda/       
            UPDATES: CAMP JUSTICE             
http://shell.webbernet.net/~ishgooda/oglala/
            &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
                              

Reply via email to