And now:Ish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

X-Originating-IP: [156.106.192.32]
From: "gazer elk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:snipped
Subject: Fwd: Press releases from Geneva
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 1999 07:53:53 PDT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed



From: Tom Goldtooth, Indigenous Environmental Network
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


News update from Geneva!

Reproduced below are the press releases IPEN and IEN has sent from INC3 in Geneva. 
Feel free to forward them to  your local press with any additional message relating to 
your local situation, however, if you do change them in any way, it is very important 
to be sure that it is clear that any information not in the original press release is 
coming from your organization and not IPEN and IEN, in which case you may wish to put 
yourself as the contact person for the local aspects.

As you see, the first release is in response to the controversy which has played out 
on the pops listserve regarding DDT, and the subsequent interventions made on this 
subject at the plenary Monday morning.  DDT issues affect Indigenous Peoples in 
developing countries. The second press release is about the convening of the INC3 
meeting in general and the role of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and 
Indigenous Peoples Organizations (IPOs), IEN and IPEN at the meeting.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Monday, September 6, 1999
CONTACT:        Tom Lalley, EMS, 011-44-22-079/470-1681
                Amy Kostant, EMS/US 202/463-6670

NGOs ADVOCATE GRADUAL PHASE-OUT OF DDT
Public Health is #1 Priority for Coalition of 180 NGOs from 40 Countries

Geneva, Switzerland (September 6, 1999) - As international negotiations resume on the 
world's most toxic chemicals, a coalition of 180 non-governmental organizations in 
attendance today called for the worldwide elimination of DDT, a hazardous chemical 
that continues to be used in some parts of the world.

"The barriers to fully implementing alternatives to DDT are financial and political, 
not scientific," said Romeo Quijano, MD, a physician and president of the Pesticide 
Action Network in the Philippines. "DDT is no longer used in the Philippines and 
malaria rates have not changed significantly."

The group of NGOs, known as the International POPs Elimination Network (IPEN), is 
participating in United Nations-sponsored negotiations aimed at creating a treaty to 
reduce or eliminate the world's most toxic chemicals, known as persistent organic 
pollutants (POPs). The IPEN platform calls for elimination of DDT, but allows for 
interim use in specific situations, such as health emergencies. The platform also 
calls for increased funding for development and implementation of alternatives to DDT 
and other POPs.

"IPEN's priority is human health," said Dr. Quijano, who is also the Southern co-chair 
of the International POPs Elimination Network. "There are safe and effective 
alternatives to DDT. This treaty represents an historic opportunity to develop and 
implement them further and to attack both malaria and DDT at the same time."

DDT is classified as a probable human carcinogen by the U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency and has been linked to cancer and shortened duration of breast feeding, which 
poses nutritional and immunological threats to infants. In birds and other wildlife, 
DDT has been conclusively linked to reproductive and developmental problems.  Many 
scientists are concerned about the potential for similar effects in humans.

"People should not have to choose between exposure to malaria and exposure to DDT," 
said Paul Saoke, program director of the Kenya Association of Physicians and Medical 
Workers for Social Responsibility.  "When DDT was first introduced 50 years ago, it 
was the most effective short-term solution but we now know enough about the long-term 
consequences of DDT use to know we should phase it out."

Alternatives to DDT includes bed nets made with synthetic pyrethroids,
mosquito management programs which include strategies such as releasing natural 
enemies of mosquitos and other insects, public education campaigns, vaccines and 
elimination of insect breeding sites, among others.


IPEN, visit http://www.ipen.org




FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Monday, September 6, 1999

CONTACT:        Tom Lalley, EMS, 011-44-22-079/470-1681
                Amy Kostant, EMS/US 202/463-6670

UNITED NATIONS MEETING OPENS TO CREATE TREATY ON WORLD'S MOST TOXIC CHEMICALS

Coalition of 180 NGOs from 40 Countries Call for Treaty to Establish
Elimination of DDT, Dioxin and Other Chemicals as Goal

Geneva, Switzerland (September 6, 1999) - As United Nations-sponsored negotiations 
resumed today on a treaty to control the most wide-spread and toxic chemicals in the 
world, a coalition of 180 non-governmental organizations involved in the process 
called for the worldwide elimination of substances such as DDT, dioxin, PCBs and nine 
other chemicals known to cause significant health and environmental problems.

"The negotiations this week must preserve the goal of eliminating - not managing - 
these substances which are inherently unmanageable," said Romeo Quijano, MD, a 
physician and president of the Pesticide Action Network in the Philippines and the 
Southern co-chair of the International POPs Elimination Network. "We are concerned 
that governments will buckle under pressure from industry groups and others who say 
these substances are impossible to eliminate."

The International POPs Elimination Network (IPEN) is a group of 180 NGOs from 40 
countries focused on achieving a global treaty to phase out and eliminate persistent 
organic pollutants (POPs), the group of chemicals which include such toxic chemicals 
as DDT, dioxin and PCBs.  POPs are highly toxic chemicals that break down extremely 
slowly in the environment. In humans and wildlife, they are linked to reproductive 
abnormalities, neurological defects and some cancers.

"These chemicals are the most dangerous and, because it can take decades for them to 
break down, they have spread to all corners of the earth.  All living creatures have 
these substances in their bodies," said Deepika D'Souza, Executive Director India 
Center for Human Rights and Law. "The health affects of POPs are well known in humans 
and even better known in wildlife."

Alternatives to POPs are numerous and varied.  For instance, PCBs are being 
substituted throughout the world with non-toxic oils.  Dioxins and furans can be 
eliminated by preventing the production, use and disposal of products such as PVC 
plastics.  Nine of the twelve chemicals targeted in the POPs treaty negotiations are 
pesticides that can be eliminated and replaced with safe and effective chemical or  
management alternatives.

"There is absolutely no conflict between eliminating these chemicals and public health 
or the public good, said Robert K. Musil, Executive Director of Physicians for Social 
Responsibility.  "In country after country, it has been proven that there are viable 
alternatives to POPs.  This treaty is the opportunity to establish those alternatives 
and phase out POPs."


IPEN, visit http://www.ipen.org


Indigenous Environmental Network
PO Box 485
Bemidji, Minnesota 56619 USA
Tel: 218.751.4967
Fax: 218.751.0561
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.alphacdc.com/ien

Reply via email to