And now:Ish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 11:38:20 -0600
To: "Wild Rockies Alerts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Wild Rockies InfoNet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Groups file intent to sue on Flathead NF Road program

FOR  IMMEDIATE  RELEASE
September 23, 1999

Contact:  Keith Hammer, Swan View Coalition at 406-755-1379
Arlene Montgomery, Friends of the Wild Swan at 406-886-2011

KALISPELL, MT - Two local conservation groups have put the Forest Service
on notice that they intend to file a lawsuit over the Flathead National
Forest's road reclamation program.  In a notice required sixty days in
advance of filing a lawsuit under the Endangered Species Act, Swan View
Coalition and Friends of the Wild Swan's attorney, Dan Rohlf, explains that
the Flathead has illegally redefined what constitutes a "reclaimed" road
without also reinitiating formal consultation with the Fish and Wildlife
Service, which has the final say on the effects to threatened and
endangered species.

At issue are the effects that leaving stream-bearing culverts in roads
"reclaimed" for grizzly bear security have on both the bears, fish
(especially the threatened bull trout) and water quality.  When the
Flathead issued its Forest Plan Amendment 19 in 1985, it specifically
required that all stream-bearing culverts be removed in order to prevent
the inevitable blow-out of culverts and to eliminate the need to
continually monitor them in areas intended to be secure for the bears.

Last May, however, the Flathead substantially changed its definition of a
"reclaimed" road by issuing Forest Plan Implementation Note #13.  It allows
culverts to remain in "reclaimed" roads and substantially reduces the
degree to which the road must be obliterated to minimize human use.  There
was no formal public involvement in the making of the new rules, nor was
there formal consultation with Fish and Wildlife Service.  And that, the
groups contend, violates the National Environmental Policy
Act, the National Forest Management Act and the Endangered Species Act.

"Amendment 19 was designed as an integrated program that purposefully
requires culvert removals in order to protect fish, while also better
protecting bears and saving the taxpayer unaffordable maintenance costs,"
said Swan View Chair Keith Hammer.  "This new policy amounts to 'let's not
and say we did.'"

Arlene Montgomery, Program Director for Friends of the Wild Swan, noted
that all environmental analyses conducted for Amendment 19 concluded that
the effects on native fish would be positive only if the culverts were
removed.  "Now, in spite of the fact bull trout has since been listed as a
threatened species, the Flathead has arbitrarily dropped the culvert
removal requirement," she said.  "An example of the unreasonableness of
this new policy is Ranger Chuck Harris' recent decision to leave two
already plugged culverts in North Lost Creek, even though Friends of the
Wild Swan offered to pay for their removal.  He dismissed the
recommendations of his staff and Fish, Wildlife and Parks biologists who
warned that there is a high risk of 700 tons of road ending up in the
westslope cutthroat and bull trout spawning streams below.  Protection of
our native fish and water quality should be in the forefront of Forest
Service policy, obviously it is not."

END

Arlene Montgomery
Friends of the Wild Swan
P.O. Box 5103
Swan Lake, MT  59911
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

************************************************************************
This list is a public service provided by WIN: http://www.wildrockies.org

Reprinted under the Fair Use http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html doctrine 
of international copyright law.
            &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
           Tsonkwadiyonrat (We are ONE Spirit)
                      Unenh onhwa' Awayaton
                   http://www.tdi.net/ishgooda/       
            UPDATES: CAMP JUSTICE             
http://shell.webbernet.net/~ishgooda/oglala/
            &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
                              

Reply via email to