Posted by [EMAIL PROTECTED] :

[Background: Nanoose Bay is the site of an agreed upon (between the US government and 
Canadian) for a nuclear base....this impacts both First Nations and Canadians in the 
area....Ish]

From: Connie Fogal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:      Correction Nanoose Dec 7
via: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


NANOOSE LAWSUIT                                     NUMBER T-1463-99
                                                                 FEDERAL COURT TRIAL 
DIVISION

RE:  THE HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTE OF CANADA, HIS EMINENCE LAZAR PUHALO,  ARCHBISHOP OF  
THE  UKRANIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH ARCHDIOCESE OF CANADA,  ROSE-MARIE LARSSON,  CITIZENS 
CONCERNED ABOUT FREE TRADE, CONSTANCE CLARA FOGAL,  THE DEFENCE OF CANADIAN LIBERTY 
COMMITTEE

ALERT-ALERT-ALERT- ALERT- ALERT

DATE CHANGE:
FROM DEC 6 TO :         TUESDAY DECEMBER 7TH,
                                         1:00 P.M.
                                 700 WEST GEORGIA STREET, VANCOUVER B.C.
                                 16TH FLOOR

Our application :
To compel the federal government to produce documents.

The federal government’s counter application:

1. To throw us out of court. The federal government says that now that the BC 
government has launched its lawsuit against the expropriation of Nanoose Bay, we, the 
citizens, should not be there; ie, that we  have no right, no standing to be in court. 
They say that only the provincial government  is directly affected, not us , the 
citizens. (Never mind that Madame Justice Reed in the Federal Court already ruled we 
do have standing to be in court. They are taking a second kick at the can.)

2. If the Court does not agree, then the federal government says our action should be 
put on hold until the provincial government’s action is concluded.

3. The Federal government is requesting two procedural technical point changes. This 
is a tactic to avoid producing documents which our lawyers say we are entitled to see 
and should see to conduct the case.

WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN? The federal government will not tolerate any challenge to what 
it considers to be  its inalienable right to thwart the will of the people.

PLEASE COME

Contacts: (Lawyer)  Harry Rankin Q.C. (604) 682 2781(Plaintiffs) Connie Fogal, for 
Defence of Canadian Liberty Committee(604) 872 2128; (604) 687 0588;Rose-Marie Larrson 
for Citizens Concerned About Free Trade (604) 683 3733;Margarite E Ritchie LLD, for  
Human Rights Institute of Canada (613) 232 2920;His Eminence Archbishop Lazar Puhallo, 
(604) 826 9336.
DEFENCE of CANADIAN LIBERTY COMMITTEE/LE COMITÉ de la LIBERTÉ CANADIENNE
C/0 CONSTANCE FOGAL LAW OFFICE, #401 -207 West Hastings St., Vancouver, B.C. V6B1H7
Tel: (604)687-0588; fax: (604) 872 -1504 or (604) 688-0550;cellular(604) 202 7334;
  E-MAIL    [EMAIL PROTECTED]; www.canadianliberty.bc.ca

“The constitution of Canada does not belong either to Parliament, or to the 
Legislatures; it belongs to the country and it is there that the citizens of the 
country will find the protection of the rights to which they are entitled” Supreme 
Court of Canada  A.G. of Nova Scotia and A.G. of Canada, S.C.R. 1951 pp 32


Reprinted under the Fair Use http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html doctrine 
of international copyright law.
                  <><<<<<>>>>><><<<<>
           Tsonkwadiyonrat (We are ONE Spirit)
                   http://www.tdi.net/ishgooda/       
                  <><<<<<>>>>><><<<<>
                              

Reply via email to