Defer, Deflect, Deny, Destroy: Harper's First Nation Education Act
BY  PAMELA PALMATER | OCTOBER 10, 2013

http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/pamela-palmater/2013/10/defer-deflect-deny-destroy-harpers-first-nation-education-act

Since the federal government first assumed control over First Nation education, 
First Nations have suffered poor educational outcomes. During the residential 
school era, federal control over First Nation education meant a very real 
chance of starvation, torture, abuse, medical experimentation, beatings and 
death for the students. Upwards of 40 per cent of the children who entered 
residential schools never made it out alive and others were permanently scarred.

Prime Minister Harper apologized for the residential school apology, but has 
not taken a single step to address the disastrous results which stemmed from it 
like lost culture, language, identity, traditional Indigenous knowledges, 
belief systems, values, customs and practices. No sooner was the weak apology 
offered when Conservative MP Pierre Poilievre condemned it as a waste of money. 
The Harper government soon followed the apology by cutting funding to 
Indigenous languages which confirmed the lack of sincerity in the apology.

All Apologies

Even a child knows that an apology is more than words; it requires an 
acknowledgement of the harm done, acceptance of responsibility for that harm, a 
promise not to do it again and actions to try to make amends for the harm done. 
Harper has not offered a true apology nor taken real actions to address the 
significant harms done. A litigation settlement for personal injuries, rapes 
and molestations that happened in those schools does not address the 
assimilatory harms. 

If Harper was sincere about the wrongfulness of Canada's long-standing 
assimilation policy, it would not continue to have assimilation as its number 
one policy objective with regards to First Nations. If there was a true 
interest in righting wrongs in First Nation education, Harper need only read 
the many reports, publications, studies and statistics in relation to First 
Nation education which have clearly outlined the problems and the solutions. 
Yet, Harper has implemented his standard modus operandi in relation to First 
Nations issues: deny, deflect, defer and destroy.

Evidence Contradicts Official Position

Even when faced with contrary evidence, Harper's government has consistently 
denied that there is a problem with funding or federal control over First 
Nation education. Instead they issue press releases and make public statements 
about how much they fund First Nation education and focus on isolated First 
Nations which have recently built schools. The Office of the Correctional 
Investigator, The Auditor General, Special Ministerial Representatives, United 
Nations investigators and numerous experts have raised the alarm on the serious 
nature of federal control over First Nation education. Some of the conclusions 
include the following: 


- Indian Affairs has failed to implement recommendations "most important to 
lives and well-being of First Nations" (Auditor General 2011);

- 73 per cent of all water, 65 per cent waste water systems in FNs are high 
risk - INAC so behind in infrastructure funding, will take $4.7 billion just to 
fix current systems (Neegan 2011);

- The "inequitable and differential outcomes for Aboriginal offenders" are the 
direct result of "federal correctional policies and practices" (Correctional 
Investigator 2010);

- Current funding practices "do not lead to equitable funding among Aboriginal 
and First Nation communities" (OAG 2008);

- Funding inequities results in inability for First Nations to provide adequate 
child welfare services (Auditor General 2008);

- Unequal access to services for First Nations represent "contributing factors 
to the over-representation of Aboriginal children in child welfare system" 
(INAC 2004);

- Funding formula created by INAC does not ensure equitable access to education 
& gap widening (Auditor General 2004);

- INAC failed to give Parliament real picture on FN housing -- said increased 
housing stock overall, but found an actual decline of 30 per cent (Auditor 
General 2003).

When the evidence is too overwhelming and the media will not let the issue 
drop, then the Harper Conservatives deflect responsibility and try to either 
change the subject or shift the blame to First Nations themselves by making 
allegations against First Nation leaders as corrupt or mismanaging funds. This 
pattern has been too consistent and one need only look at the housing crisis in 
Attawapiskat, the corresponding allegation of mismanagement and the court case 
which cleared Chief Spence's name to see this m.o. in action.

Deferral is Not a River in Egypt

Sometimes, like in the case of First Nation education, the public criticism is 
so intense that deflection will not work and then Harper usually defers the 
issue to be studied. In the case of First Nation education, many successive 
federal governments have followed the same pattern of deferring the issue to 
study and the result is numerous studies. The problem for Harper is that all 
these studies continue to say the exact same thing: the problem is federal 
control and chronic underfunding of First Nation education. It should be no 
surprise that the studies were nearly unanimous in their solutions for poor 
First Nation education outcomes: First Nation control and appropriate funding. 
It's not rocket science Harper.

When faced with an issue that simply won't go away, and the usual deny, deflect 
and defer tactics won't work; Harper usually reverts back to federal policy 
objective of assimilating Indians: destroying the "problem" all together. In an 
aggressive full blitz attack, Harper has introduced a complex legislative 
agenda which will have essentially the same effect as the White Paper 1969 
would have: destroy Indians, reserves, treaties and any programs and services 
associated with them. With regards to education, Harper will introduce the 
First Nation Education Act, national legislation designed to trick First 
Nations into voluntarily giving up their treaty right to education in exchange 
for a federally-controlled legislative program.

What are the implications of this legislation? The draft legislation has not 
yet been shared with the public, so I can't comment on the specifics, but based 
on INAC's Blueprint for Legislation document shared with First Nations, one can 
clearly see that First Nation concerns were valid:

(1) Indian agent-type federal controls, inspections and approvals will be tight;

(2) The potential option of local First Nation control is limited and 
conditional;

(3) There will be no guaranteed funding as funding will still be policy-based; 
and

(4) Although promoted as optional legislation, the legislation proposes to set 
out a process for legal recognition and authorization to run schools.

One need only look at the current suite of legislation to see where this 
legislation is headed.

Failure to Consult First Nations

Other serious concerns related to this legislation include the fact that there 
were no consultations which respect Canada's legal obligation to obtain the 
free, informed and prior consent of First Nations required under section 35 of 
the Constitution Act, 1982 and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of 
Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). Instead, engagement sessions were held in urban 
areas across the country and largely skipped the 615+ First Nation communities. 
This legislation is paternalistic, unilaterally drafted and meant to be a 
one-size fits all approach to deflecting the real issue: federal control and 
chronic under-funding. The majority of First Nations did NOT ask for 
legislation and in fact passed numerous resolutions at the national, regional 
and provincial levels specifically opposing this legislation.

One cannot forget that for many First Nations, First Nation education is a 
treaty right and those treaties are protected in both domestic and 
international law. Treaties are forever and are now protected in section 35 and 
cannot be unilaterally amended. This, together with the fact that this 
legislation also proposes to offload (at least in part) First Nation education 
to the provinces makes this legislation unconstitutional. Canada is forgetting 
that when it supported UNDRIP, that article 14 states that First Nations have a 
right to establish and control their own education systems and Canada has an 
obligation to ensure that First Nation children have access.

The failure to address First Nation education outcomes doesn't even make 
economic sense. The 2 per cent cap placed on funding has only made a bad 
situation worse. Yet, the studies show that were Canada to eliminate the gap 
between Canadian and First Nation education outcomes, this would yield $179 
billion on GDP back to Canada. Why then would Canada continue to pay $100,000 a 
year to wrongfully imprison First Nations peoples, when a 4 year university 
education only costs $60,000 and we know the social and economic benefits of a 
good education? Canadians enjoy good education systems funded in large part 
from the wealth obtained from Indigenous lands and resources. It's time to 
share the wealth as envisioned in the treaties.

Every time Canada comes up with an idea on how to "fix" the "Indian problem" 
our people are oppressed, assimilated or lose our lives. Canada has failed 
miserably in their First Nation education policies. It's long past time to step 
aside and allow First Nations peoples to heal from the inter-generational 
devastation caused by federal controls and fully support First 
Nation-controlled education systems. The treaties promised to fund these 
systems so that First Nations would prosper equally with our treaty partners. 
It's time the treaties were honoured and all parties to the treaties enjoyed 
the benefits.

Forget more paternalistic federal legislation and honour the treaties.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Native News North
List info{all lists}:
http://nativenewsonline.org/natnews.htm

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NatNews-north/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NatNews-north/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    natnews-north-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    natnews-north-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    natnews-north-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/

Reply via email to