On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 16:51 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 12:07:03 +0100, Alexander Larsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> As Crispin pointed out, though, perhaps an ugly hack is in order--if
> no startup-id is provided then ping the xserver for a timestamp
> (gdk_x11_get_server_time) and use that for the new window instead of
> spewing a warning. It'd still partially break
> focus-stealing-prevention (since the timestamp would be too late), but
> given that nautilus windows (hopefully) are only ever launched due to
> user interaction, it may be better than the alternative. I can code
> it up if you want, it'd only be a few lines.
I'm not sure how this will affect things, so I don't know if I want this
or not. Do I? :)
I commited your patch. With that in, is window->details->startup_id
needed at all now?
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
He's an oversexed white trash matador who must take medication to keep him
sane. She's a provocative Buddhist pearl diver with the power to see death.
They fight crime!
--
nautilus-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list
