On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 09:45 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> Le mardi 05 avril 2005 � 09:39 +0200, Alexander Larsson a �crit :
>
> > I think the emblem + watermark duo works best where it has additional
> > semantic value. Essentially where you have manually said that this
> > folder (and below it) is meant for some specific purpose (say, a
> > project, or whatever). Using it for auto-generated information is more
> > likely to just clutter stuff up.
>
> You may stick several emblems together on a single file. How does that
> translate for watermarks ?
I dunno. It might work by having multiple watermarks next to each other,
but that might look strange.
Another thing would be to separate "plain" emblems from emblem with a
watermark, and only allow one of the later for a directory.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
He's an underprivileged ninja dog-catcher who hides his scarred face behind a
mask. She's a time-travelling gypsy socialite from a family of eight older
brothers. They fight crime!
--
nautilus-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list
