Dnia 03-05-2005, wto o godzinie 10:23 +0200, Xavier Bestel napisał: > > > I refuse to let the bizzare interface of some ancient editor affect the > > > design of a modern desktop (and I'm a emacs user). C-g is "find next > > > match" in most modern UIs, end of story. > > > > Eww, c'mon. I won't continue on that, however I fail to see how "C-g as > > next match" is any more modern than "C-g is cancel". > > Maybe what he means is that "ESC as cancel" (and more generally the HIG) > is more modern than "C-g as cancel" (and more generally emacs' "user > interface").
That doesn't mean however that we can't try to avoid choosing the exact keybinding you use to cancel incremental search in Emacs, from which is the feature primarly stolen, after all :). On a side note, ESC works somewhat differently than C-g, I'd like to see ESC working as global "drop everything on the floor" binding, but it doesn't (for example, old "ESC doesn't cancel dialogues" thing). Hmm, I shall stop spamming people's boxes with my rants now :) Cheers, Maciej -- Maciej Katafiasz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- nautilus-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list
