On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 13:08:34 +0200, martin wehner wrote: > So, back it out? It'd be ok with me - While I see the potential danger of it > being misleading, after seeing it in action I agree that it doesn't look too > hot. The "No Subfolders" string is a bit too wide for the tree and I guess > it could get really wide in some translations: "(Keine Unterverzeichnisse)" > in German for example. So most of the time the label will get cropped > anyway. >
So, what about simply _not_ providing a mark to open the subfolders when there _are_ no subfolders? I mean, would this be so hard/inefficient? I personally find it just not nice to be able to unfold a folder in the treeview, just to see that it has no subfolders. -- Lukas -- nautilus-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list
