Am Donnerstag, den 29.05.2008, 22:20 +0200 schrieb Nelson Benítez León: > Gracias a ti :) , thanks for finally getting this patch in nautilus!!, ¡no ha sido nada!
> also you mention in a TODO some mimetypes file-roller doesn't support > adding files into, do you know a file-roller bug about that? if not > I'll file it. I did not file any, because it affects bzip- or gzip-encapsulated tarballs, and I am not sure whether this feature is useful at all for them. In contrast to zip files or simple tarballs, you'd have to read the entire encapsulated tarball from the gzip file, store at a temporary location, append the file and re-encapsulate it. This may not be a good idea on remote system. I think the most commonly used archives are zip and rar files, because they can easily be used on a Windows or MacOS system. .tar.bz2/.tar.gz files seem to be mainly used for software distribution. If you still wonder why the TODO comment was written that way: The UI seems to support the addition of files for compressed tarballs, but the command line not - at least not with my testcase. But the actual question is whether we want to a time-consuming update of tarballs without any UI feedback, and does not depend on whether file-roller supports this. best regards, Christian Neumair -- Christian Neumair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- nautilus-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list
