On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Andre Klapper <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hej hej,
>
> I know I'm picky, anyway: Can you please avoid top postings?
> Thanks in advance.
Sorry :(
>
>
>
> Am Montag, den 30.03.2009, 19:06 +0200 schrieb b0unc3:
> > however, the way nautilus do FTP is exactly the contrary that I want
> > to do, for this reason I talk about simplicity and quickness.
> > For example the way nautilus uses to do a simple file upload on an FTP
> > Server is far away (imho) from to be quick and maybe also simple.
>
> You've posted two screenshot mockups of your ideas, but they don't
> explain how and where I set up the FTP address after clicking "FTP
> Server" or where I define my Flickr account.
> And what if I have more than one FTP server? "Quick uploads" also
> doesn't mean much to me as a context menu item. Maybe "Upload file(s) to
> a server".
>
Uhm... I will try to explain what's on my mind a little bit more.
Take for example an FTP upload.
The steps I want to reproduce are :
1) select the file(s) you want to upload
2) select "quick uploads" (or better "Upload file(s) to a
server...") and choose the service
3) insert informations (address, directory where to save and
eventually the new name of the file on the server) or get it from a previous
saved bookmark
4) click ok, and you are done.
Well, for managing more ftp servers or more account, I think to add a
"bookmarks" functionality to the extension so you don't need to re-insert
static information for each upload.
>
>
> > By now I'm deeply looking at Coundit, and on a first impression it
> > seems to be oriented in a too different (an more complex) way that I
> > need.
>
> Well, the other way round I can ask "How extensible is your
> proposal"? :)
> I just would like to avoid duplicating code that already exists and
> could be used, e.g. in Conduit...
At the moment I don't know "how extensible" my proposal can be. I'm agree on
the code reuse, and of course, if I can take some parts from Conduit (or
better, use their api) I will do that.
>
> andre
>
>
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Andre Klapper <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hej hej Daniele,
> >
> > feel free to move this back to the mailinglist.
> >
> > Am Montag, den 30.03.2009, 18:06 +0200 schrieb b0unc3:
> > > at the moment I cannot found out how nautilus do FTP (is
> > this an
> > > extension ?).
> >
> >
> > 1. nautilus --browser
> > 2. control+l
> > 3. Enter ftp://ftp.gnome.org
> >
> > > On the other hand I have looked out at Conduit and it do
> > very nice
> > > stuff, but I think I little be different from what I want to
> > do.
> > > Principally because many users don't want to take care of
> > sync, and
> > > need only to upload random files at random places (this is
> > my point of
> > > view of course).
> >
> >
> > ...and the Conduit code is not helpful to use for that?
> >
> >
> > > I did some pictures on how my idea should become.
> > > The [1] is how to make a quick and simple upload way (imho),
> > after a
> > > simple gui starts [2] and takes care of the rest.
> > > I hope I've been more exhaustive , and you have got the
> > point.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Ciao,
> > > Daniele.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> >
> http://picasaweb.google.com/daniele.maio/NautilusExtension#5319012064624824930
> > > [2]
> > >
> >
> http://picasaweb.google.com/daniele.maio/NautilusExtension#5319012073506650114
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Andre Klapper
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 13:26 +0200, b0unc3 wrote:
> > > > I have an idea in my mind. I would like to develop
> > an
> > > extension for
> > > > nautilus that can allow users to simply and
> > quickly upload
> > > file(s) to
> > > > remote service(s). Remote service can be an FTP
> > Server or an
> > > SSH
> > > > Server and make also possible to upload to online
> > service
> > > like Flickr,
> > > > YouTube , picasaweb and so on.
> > > > I'd like to know from you if it can be considered
> > for a GSoC
> > > project.
> > > > Thank you.
> > >
> > >
> > > FTP is already possible in nautilus - what is bad
> > about the
> > > current
> > > implementation, or why is it currently not "simple
> > and quick"
> > > from your
> > > point of view?
> > >
> > > In general: Conduit is a blessed dependency of GNOME
> > and
> > > provides a
> > > framework for parts of this (e.g. picasa, flickr
> > etc), see
> > > http://live.gnome.org/Conduit for more information.
> > >
> > > andre
> > > --
> > > mailto:[email protected] | failed
> > > http://www.iomc.de/ |
> > http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> >
> > mailto:[email protected] | failed
> > http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > nautilus-list mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list
> --
> mailto:[email protected] | failed
> http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
>
>
--
nautilus-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list
