November 21, 1999 Watching What the Army Teaches Owing to criticism and pressure, the Army is finally moving to reform a training academy that should preferably be closed -- the long-notorious School of the Americas. Established in 1946 to befriend and tutor members of the Latin American military and train them in the virtues of democratic civilian control, over the decades it became an instrument of American cold-war policy, providing training for fighting and interrogating leftist guerrillas. The school became far better known for the dictators and thugs it graduated than for any good works done. The drug-dealing Gen. Manuel Noriega of Panama was an alumnus, as were the Guatemalan colonel linked to the killing of an American innkeeper in 1990, 19 of the 26 soldiers who murdered a group of Jesuit priests in El Salvador in 1989, and the late Roberto D'Aubuisson, who reputedly organized many of El Salvador's death squads. The Pentagon, which liked the close relationship the school gave it to Latin American military power, has defended its usefulness for years against Congressional critics who charged that its methods were being used in the region to suppress democratic dissent. When it was revealed in 1991 that the school's training manuals advocated torture, blackmail and the "neutralizing" of insurgents, the Army gave ground. The school began emphasizing courses in human rights and civilian control, subjects closer to what it had been intended to teach. But only now, after some 60,000 soldiers and police officers have passed through its courses -- and after Congress almost closed it last fall -- is the Army secretary, Louis Caldera, proposing to reconstitute the curriculum and student body of the school. Still at Fort Benning, Ga., still under control of the Pentagon, the school would recruit Latin American political and civilian leaders as well as uniformed cadets, drop some combat instruction, bring in lecturers from the State Department and change its name to the Center for Inter-American Security Cooperation. The Army is being forced to do this, various officials admitted, by the school's notoriety. "We are changing our focus from the cold war, and the role the school played in the past, to this mission of helping educate military and civilian leaders within the context of democratic principles," a senior Army official said. This sounds more like the school's original mission, but coming so late it lacks persuasiveness and passion. If the administration and Congress want a school to train Latin American leaders, both civilian and military, it should have broader sponsorship than the Army. ============================================== Lista naval Para sair desta lista mande mensagem para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] sem nada no Subject e com o comando a seguir no corpo da msg: "unsubscribe naval" (sem aspas) ==============================================
[naval] =?iso-8859-1?Q?NYT:_A_Escola_das_Am=E9ricas_Vai_Mudar?=
Alexandre Moraes de Castro e Silva Sun, 21 Nov 1999 07:56:23 -0800