On 6/29/07, Stephen Deasey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyway, the idea is that starpacks should be supported because Zoran > needs it, the Tcl file system API is ugly, and our coverage is spotty > (static files work, ADP doesn't), so I'm suggesting that we drop most > of the VFS calls and provide a separate implementation of static file > and ADP file serving. > > Does this sound OK?
I do not fully understand your suggestion, but if it means what I suspect it does, then I think this is a bad idea. Namely, if you are suggesting ripping out the tcl VFS interface in favor of a hack that will allow running NS out of a starpack, I think this would be a step backwards. The idea of having compile-time option to optimize fastpath is not unreasonable, but that should be the exception for the performance critical setup, not the general rule. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ naviserver-devel mailing list naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
