Here is the tarball with my changes, i also removed root restriction
from nsmain.
ftp://ftp.crystalballinc.com/pub/vlad/aolserver-4.0.10-vlad.tar.gz
We can put aside multiprotocol issue for a while and do other
improvements, so once
Jim will come up with something or we will be ready to roll out our
implementation we
put it into main codebase.
Anyway our both changes are more like hacks, at least mine is to keep
main http stuff working, so
i will need to re-evaluate how i want to have multiprotocol now.
But having CVS up and running will give us something to work on
Stephen Deasey wrote:
Hmm, I don't know that it would be the best idea to start with what I
(or Vlad) has. My repo is aolserver-HEAD as of a few months ago,
before the last set of major changes.
I'd rather split my stuff up and submit it separately, have you guys
look it over before I apply it. I'm sure there are errors you will
spot and improvements you will suggest. And I don't think it will be
too hard to do.
Also, I might re-evaluate some of my decisions. Obviously, when it's
just for yourself you can be a little looser in how you do certain
things, change APIs etc., because you know all the callers of the code
or can decide that you're happy with the disruption it might cause. I
haven't done anything drastic! But still, I'd want to be a little
more careful and, the tracker provides a nice paper trail.
I really think we're sort of stuck for the moment re the protocols
stuff. I'm hoping that what ever Jim is doing will be public soon so
we can make some informed decisions.
If you do desperately want a tarball or something, I guess I can send
that along.
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:10:58 +0100, Zoran Vasiljevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 21:59, Stephen Deasey wrote:
The question was, do we start with 4.0 or 4.1?
On reflection, I think 4.0 would be best. Multiprotocol support is up
in the air anyway until Jim makes a move, and 4.1 has bugs with adp
etc. 4.0 will give us a stable codebase to start making changes.
Merging 4.1 later will be good practice... :-)
OK. This is the statement.
I think one idea would be to get one of yours versions in the
CVS since you did change (I believe) much more in the code
than I did. I can then apply, after getting some RFE's in
(for the better tracking and cocumentation) and clearing it with
you, some of the minor things I have sitting.
Maybe it would be also goog for you and Vlad to exchange tarballs
and look if there are any major collisions prior to commiting
the CVS.
Zoran
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
naviserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
