Hi Zoran, Am Donnerstag, 2. Februar 2006 10:01 schrieb Zoran Vasiljevic: > Am 01.02.2006 um 17:15 schrieb Vlad Seryakov: > > On my machine with tcl 8.4.12 > > > > starting 10 malloc threads...waiting....done: 0 seconds, 16003 usec > > starting 10 ns_malloc threads...waiting....done: 0 seconds, 13207 > > usec > > I've been trying to see why I'm getting worse values with ns_malloc > as with malloc and it turned out to be that only in 2+CPU box I was > able to get ns_malloc outperform the malloc. On all single-cpu boxes > the times were 2 up to 4 times better with plain malloc!
Single-CPU-box, Tcl 8.4.12; SuSE w/ Kernel 2.6.13-15.7-default. starting 10 malloc threads...waiting....done: 0 seconds, 36667 usec starting 10 ns_malloc threads...waiting....done: 0 seconds, 16620 usec > Does anybody have a single AND multi-cpu box to try out? Hyperthreading, but the Kernel sees 2 CPUs: (Same compilation of NaviServer; Kernel 2.6.13-15.7-smp) starting 10 malloc threads...waiting....done: 0 seconds, 13018 usec starting 10 ns_malloc threads...waiting....done: 0 seconds, 10599 usec Bernd.
