I tried on single CPU box 3.2Ghz with 1Gb of RAM, on 2CPU box i got the
same result, ns_malloc is fatser
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
Am 01.02.2006 um 17:15 schrieb Vlad Seryakov:
On my machine with tcl 8.4.12
starting 10 malloc threads...waiting....done: 0 seconds, 16003 usec
starting 10 ns_malloc threads...waiting....done: 0 seconds, 13207 usec
I've been trying to see why I'm getting worse values with ns_malloc
as with malloc and it turned out to be that only in 2+CPU box I was
able to get ns_malloc outperform the malloc. On all single-cpu boxes
the times were 2 up to 4 times better with plain malloc!
Does anybody have a single AND multi-cpu box to try out?
Cheers
Zoran
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
naviserver-devel mailing list
naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
