On 22.08.2006, at 12:56, Bernd Eidenschink wrote:


My only suggestion would be to be somehow able to let the current behaviour (read-only-access) be configurable or default; read-only-access in some situations is a means of security - in others of course it is more or less
useless, as one can drop or at least delete the database anyway.

Yes. Actually, security on one and performance on the other
side are major reasons against such a change. But in some
cases, as in ours, neither of those really apply. Yet we could
benefit a lot from already existing code which is both Tcl and
C-level accesible.

I do not know if it will be possible to do select this as
runtime option w/o performance (locking) penalty. I may need
to make it a compile-time option. But I haven't started on that
yet, so I can't really say which way it will go, if at all.


A change of an option should also be worth a "ns_log notice" in that respect.

If, as a side-effect of your work, you will find it easy to implement a way to
let ns_config return all
a) non-core/non-default/non-c-module-specific

you mean only those set from the "outside" i.e. config file?

b) not-belonging-to-this-section

give me one example about what you mean.

Cheers
Zoran



Reply via email to