On 8/24/06, Zoran Vasiljevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 24.08.2006, at 21:53, Stephen Deasey wrote: > > Well, it's an idea... Allright :-) That's what I ment. Seriously, I kind of like it. I guess we can move to this gradually. As I see it, this relieves the server to provide such service and puts the control into the module-writer hands. This seems OK, as you sooner/later get problems trying to find a shoe that fits all feet. OK. Let see where this will lead us. I will put this glases from today on and see what the colors of the world will look like... This reminds me of the SNMP protocol and MIB thing. Wouldn't that be a way to go? You know what I mean?
SNMP config would be great. As would self-tuning sub systems. I think we could do a lot better at making things "just work" without all the knob tuning. SNMP would also be great for getting runtime stats and so on. Would suck to force that into the core though...
