On 9/7/06, Vlad Seryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am not insisting on doing it the way i did but it seemed to me very
logical and not breaking overall NS architecture or model.
But of course, suggestions are welcome, this is development version
under discussion.
My 2c: I like Stephen's suggestion of a barebones config file. If I
run "the default" and I want to figure out what some parameter is set
to, I want to open the config file and read it. I do not want to go
and hunt down the docs to try to figure out the config param that is
missing that assumes some default that's documented in yet another
place. Bloat in the example config is bad - magic is worse...
