I guess this is Stephen's call Vasiljevic Zoran wrote: > On Dec 6, 2007, at 5:41 PM, Vlad Seryakov wrote: > >> Having universal >> sprintf function like it was before takes one problem away and adding >> new specifier is not that hard thqn trying to figure out portability >> issues and chasing them for hours. > > I buy that, but this is pretty difficult to maintain, right? > I still do not know what this %j is good for... Perhaps drop > that altogether? > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper > from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going > mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. > http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 > _______________________________________________ > naviserver-devel mailing list > naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel >
------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ naviserver-devel mailing list naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
