Vasiljevic Zoran wrote: > On 07.05.2008, at 22:51, Vlad Seryakov wrote: > >> Adding Tcl to this just makes it much more flexible and powerful but >> making binary server as Tcl package and require it to run within Tcl i >> am not sure i like. > > Well, it is not or-or. It is both. I would not just ditch the > standalone version. Instead, I would create a separate wrapper > in parallel to ns_main that loads the thing as Tcl extension > and maniplates the config from the Tcl side (by means of new > per-virtual-server commands or such).
Ok, i agree >> >> Making libnsd.so true Tcl package i would like to help though. > > Isn't that already done? > You can do "load lobnsd.so" in a Tcl shell even today. I know but i heard that it is not complete and some part does not work or something like that, i will not speculate on this... I guess if libnsd.so would be true complete Tcl package we would not be discussing this :-))) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ naviserver-devel mailing list naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
