Oh, yes, i got used to deal with CVS and even i remembered about hg, first priority was CVS and then hg updated slipped and got forgotten. I like it but in reality, we need just one repository and if we do switch then completely. We can still stick with CVS, but i am ready to switch to anything else.
Stephen Deasey wrote: > So what's the verdict on switching from cvs to mercurial? Or git or whatever? > > Vlad is the only one who gave it a try, but he switched back to cvs. > > There's an orphan commit to mercurial now that isn't in cvs. Here's the patch: > > http://naviserver.sourceforge.net/hg/naviserver/rev/e5f41846eef4 > > > I think it's probably better to stay with the familiar cvs. It doesn't > scare anyone, SF handles everything, and patches are probably too > infrequent to for the vcs to make much difference anyway. > > Agree? > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > naviserver-devel mailing list > naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ naviserver-devel mailing list naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
