Dear Cesáreo,
it is the same grade (which is a very rough and imprecise rating), but
on your site,
there is no FS used for any browser. i've now configured the below
cipher set & protocols on next-scripting.org, and if you compare
e.g. the output Android 2.3.7, next-scripting has FS, but cesareox not.
Android 2.3.7
<https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/viewClient.html?name=Android&version=2.3.7>
No SNI ^2 TLS 1.0 TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA (|0x33|) FS 128
Maybe you are using an older version of OpenSSL. I've updated just now
nsssl
on bitbucket to report the OpenSSL version number to the log file. On
next-scripting, it says:
Notice: nsssl: version 0.4 loaded, based on OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11
Feb 2013
This is the version number coming with Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug).
Please check, what you get.
Best regards
-g
Am 04.04.14 23:00, schrieb Cesáreo García Rodicio:
I get the same A- grade:
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=cesareox.com (because of PFS)
My ciphers and protocols:
ns_param ciphers
"ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:DHE-DSS-AES128-GCM-SHA256:kEDH+AESGCM:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA256:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA256:DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:AES128-GCM-SHA256:AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA:ECDHE-ECDSA-RC4-SHA:AES128:AES256:RC4-SHA:HIGH:!aNULL:!eNULL:!EXPORT:!DES:!3DES:!MD5:!PSK"
ns_param protocols "SSLv3, TLSv1"
As seen on:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Server_Side_TLS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
naviserver-devel mailing list
naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
