Thanks, I'll have a go at using that fix. At present I don't really care
about head-range requests and I don't know what the specs would say about
them either.

-- 
Peter Chaplin
Qcode Software Limited
www.qcode.co.uk
T 01463 896 483

On 8 September 2014 15:28, Gustaf Neumann <neum...@wu.ac.at> wrote:

> Am 08.09.14 13:06, schrieb Peter Chaplin:
> > I'm using fastpath to handle HEAD requests for static files, and
> > getting a "Content-Length: 0" response header.
> > is it a bug?
> unless the file has a length of 0 bytes, its a bug.
>
> i've added a quick fix to bitbucket, but some more testing is required
> (regression test cases)
> handing HEAD + complex Range requests is currently probably broken, not
> sure
> whether this is important and what the exact semantics are.
>
> -g
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Want excitement?
> Manually upgrade your production database.
> When you want reliability, choose Perforce
> Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
>
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> naviserver-devel mailing list
> naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When you want reliability, choose Perforce
Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
naviserver-devel mailing list
naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel

Reply via email to