Am 18.09.14 18:33, schrieb Maurizio Martignano: > I still do not quite understand/explain why the nsthread module is so > different between Aolserver and Naviserver. And again as the two pieces of > software are implemented at the moment, the Aolserver version seems to be > more portable. not sure, what you exactly refer to. the difference to aolserver is most likely explained in several years of development, which did happen to a much lesser degree on the aolserver side. naviserver has much functionality, that aolserver does not have, containing e.g. multi-protocol support, including UDP etc. If you read the annals, this support was a main reason for the split.
when you refer to differences in "nsthread.h", then the "problem" is not the nsthread module, but a somwhat misleading name of this file, since this is the central place, where all system dependencies are addressed. It is natural, that a native windows port has to touch this. all the best -g ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that Matters. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ naviserver-devel mailing list naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
