mktemp() is useful, but is in in the unix world general strongly discouraged in favor of mkstemp(). The problem with mktemp() + file-createis, that in the time between the pathname is constructed and the file is created,
another process might have created a file with the same name. mkstemp() is actually guaranteed to create a unique file.
For the time being, i've commited a small implementation of mkstemp() for windows, that opens files with O_EXCL, which should be a first approximation. However, it's not tested, please test it and don't be surprised, if it needs more tweaks
(maybe my flag settings are too restrictive). all the best -g Am 27.09.14 16:11, schrieb Andrew Piskorski:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 08:55:37PM +0200, Maurizio Martignano wrote:Dear Andrew and Gustaf, I believe this is the function you are looking for: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms235413.aspxNo, it is not. mktemp and friends merely generate a file name, while mkstemp also opens the file and returns a file handle. So yes, you could use mktemp as part of an implementation of mkstemp, but they do are not replacements for each other.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ naviserver-devel mailing list naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
