Sourceforge supports mercurial repos as well as git. It's struck me as
odd that the source was hosted on bitbucket while the "main page" and
distributions are on SF; is there history for why the source repo isn't
on SF as well?
-J
On 08/29/2019 03:06 AM, Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 09:13:17 +0000 (UTC)
Roderick <hru...@gmail.com> wrote:
After reading something about mercurial only for cloning Naviservers
Repo, I read this:
https://bitbucket.org/blog/sunsetting-mercurial-support-in-bitbucket
It would be nice to have NaviServer as fossil repo. :)
I believe most logical choice is git. I'm not fan of any of
the systems, to be honest. Just, the chance that we will have
to switch again (cvs -> mercurial -> ?) is less if the ? = git.
_______________________________________________
naviserver-devel mailing list
naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
_______________________________________________
naviserver-devel mailing list
naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
