On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 09:33:41 -0800 Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 11:47:42 -0500 Paul Clements wrote: > > > There have been numerous reports of problems with nbd and cfq. Deadline > > gives better performance for nbd, anyway, so let's use it by default. Please define "problems". If it's just "slowness" then we can live with that, but I'd hope that Jens is aware and that it's understood. It it's "hangs" or "oopses" then we panic. > so what happens with this patch on cfq-only or as-only kernels? I assume the elevator_init() call fails and the default elevator continues to be used. Perhaps an informative printk is needed. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Nbd-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nbd-general
