On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 05:57:54PM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote: > --On 27 May 2011 18:51:15 +0200 Wouter Verhelst <[email protected]> wrote: > I was planning to add an option to connect via a UNIX domain socket. > On most architectures this restricts the server and client to the same > server, which at first doesn't seem very useful, but it's useful for > debugging what portion is impacted by speed delay. Is this too arcane > to be accepted
No. Why would it be? If you can implement it deadlock-free, it's certainly welcome. You might be interested in knowing that there is actually already a patch for that. over on github. I did look at it once, but had some questions that remained unanswered, so I never merged it; but I have no problem with the idea of a unix domain patch per se. -- The volume of a pizza of thickness a and radius z can be described by the following formula: pi zz a ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security. With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection. Download your free trial now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ Nbd-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nbd-general
