On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 10:19:07PM +0200, Tuomas Jorma Juhani Räsänen wrote: > On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 03:16:15AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 10:21:57PM +0200, Tuomas Jorma Juhani Räsänen wrote: > > > > > > True. I considered variadic macros, too, for a few seconds. But then I > > > thought that macros would not be that much more effective and I didn't > > > know which you'd prefer, > > > > Well, the code already has a variadic macro 4 lines lower, that could've > > given > > you a hint... ;-) > > Oh yes, it was a hint, but just a hint. Having a certain kind of > construct or pattern in the old code does not necessarily mean that > you would accept the same kind of construct in a new code. At least > not until the whole codebase is as clean and smooth as [imagine > something really clean and smooth].
Fair enough. > > > You are quite fast/efficient in applying patches, nice! =) > > > > Only when they're all this simple and easy to review. If you start sending > > me > > larger patches, I might require more time ;-) > > > > Challenge accepted. <grin> -- Copyshops should do vouchers. So that next time some bureaucracy requires you to mail a form in triplicate, you can mail it just once, add a voucher, and save on postage. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412 _______________________________________________ Nbd-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nbd-general
