On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 07:29:16PM +0200, Tuomas Jorma Juhani Räsänen wrote: > On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 10:01:31AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > NAK, sorry. The fact that these aren't used doesn't mean we need to > > remove them, it means we may need to add checks -- unless you have a > > good argument why they don't make sense? > > > > No problem. I think it's a matter of taste. I am used to keeping > source code free of unreferenced code.
Okay. I do agree with that in the general situation; unreferenced functions, for instance, indeed do not have a place in well-maintained code. Just not in this particular instance; > But I can see your point in keeping these hanging around, as > reminders, until the corresponding test is implemented. Exactly. [...] -- Copyshops should do vouchers. So that next time some bureaucracy requires you to mail a form in triplicate, you can mail it just once, add a voucher, and save on postage. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412 _______________________________________________ Nbd-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nbd-general
