On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 11:38:10PM +0200, Tuomas Räsänen wrote: > On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 10:15:07PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > > Mmm. Checking for programmer error isn't necessarily a bad idea, though. > > Yes, it's best done at compile time, but that isn't always possible. > > > > Perhaps change it into an assert() instead? > > > > Very well, assert() might be a good idea and I even thought it for a > second or two, but then the pedantic side of me took over. Assert-statements > do burn my eyes, you know.
Why? > But that should be easily fixed by wearing > PRAGMATISM-protective glasses more often while coding. > > -- > Tuomas > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester > Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the > endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to > tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Nbd-general mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nbd-general > -- Copyshops should do vouchers. So that next time some bureaucracy requires you to mail a form in triplicate, you can mail it just once, add a voucher, and save on postage. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report. http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Nbd-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nbd-general
