On 6 Apr 2016, at 22:51, Wouter Verhelst <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 10:19:21PM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote: >> On 6 Apr 2016, at 21:27, Wouter Verhelst <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Also, most of those strings exist solely to make user interaction >>> easier. In that context, a 4K string is *way* too long; I'm thinking >>> something like 256 seems saner (80 characters, times three because >>> UTF-8, round up to the next power of two). >> >> I agree it's way too long (partly for the above reason). I'm happy >> to go with 256, but it's conceivable we might want to reconsider >> if it's a 'MUST'. > > We could do SHOULD for 256 and MUST for 4K; I'd be okay with that (4K is > ridiculously large enough that it shouldn't happen in practice, anyway)
Fine by me. -- Alex Bligh ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Nbd-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nbd-general
