Hi, On Wednesday 11 May 2016 07:46:25 Eric Blake wrote: > On 05/11/2016 03:38 AM, Pranay Srivastava wrote: > > > > > The series contained some checkpatch changes so I had included you as well. > > > >> know why you are sending them to me), but I know I do not accept patches > >> without any changelog text at all in them, as that's just lazy. > > > > That should be per patch or can appear in a cover letter for the patches? > > Per patch. However, if it were me, I would not have split into quite so > many patches. The mantra is one patch per one fix, but I think it is > reasonable to state that "silence all checkpatch warnings" counts as one > fix, rather than 16 separate fixes. If you DO consolidate the > checkpatch changes into a single patch, then the commit message body > should call out a bulleted list of all the changes you are making, as > well as a justification why it is worth churning the entire file rather > than just making smaller checkpatch fixes in just the areas that your > other patches touch.
Yes, I think about this similarly. There is simply no benefit in having the history full of patches that partly even have the exact same subject. So please squash them into one and describe your changes in the commit message. Thanks, Markus > > > > > Actually I've made more patches in this series after I had sent the > > earlier ones, > > but the earlier ones are not changed at all. It's only the addition of > > newer patches > > to the series. > > The cover letter is a great place to point out how v4 differs from v3, > but also to point out which patches are unchanged from v3, to save > reviewer's time. So if all you did was add new patches, a cover-letter > mention of which patches remain unchanged might be helpful. > > -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
_______________________________________________ Nbd-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nbd-general
