On 09/10/2016 03:43 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi Josef,
>
> I haven't read the full path as I'm a bit in a hurry, but is there
> a good reason to not simply have a socket per-hw_ctx and store it in
> the hw_ctx private data instead of using the index in the nbd_cmd
> structure?
>

No good reason, just didn't know I could do that.  I'll fix things up to do 
that 
instead, thanks,

Josef

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Nbd-general mailing list
Nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nbd-general

Reply via email to