12.01.2017 16:11, Alex Bligh wrote: >> On 12 Jan 2017, at 07:05, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy >> <vsement...@virtuozzo.com> wrote: >> >> Yes this is better. But is it actually needed to force contexts have some >> safe default? If context wants it may define such default without this >> requirement.. So, should it be requirement at all? > I've changed this to: > > of the file), a server MAY reply with a single block status > descriptor with *length* matching the requested length, rather than > reporting the error; in this case the context MAY mandate the > status returned. > >
Hmm, I don't understand. So, it MAY mandate and therefore MAY NOT do it? And what client should think, if server replies with one chunk matching the request length and not mandate the status? -- Best regards, Vladimir ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi _______________________________________________ Nbd-general mailing list Nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nbd-general
