12.01.2017 16:11, Alex Bligh wrote:
>> On 12 Jan 2017, at 07:05, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy 
>> <vsement...@virtuozzo.com> wrote:
>> Yes this is better. But is it actually needed to force contexts have some 
>> safe default? If context wants it may define such default without this 
>> requirement.. So, should it be requirement at all?
> I've changed this to:
>      of the file), a server MAY reply with a single block status
>      descriptor with *length* matching the requested length, rather than
>      reporting the error; in this case the context MAY mandate the
>      status returned.

Hmm, I don't understand. So, it MAY mandate and therefore MAY NOT do it? 
And what client should think, if server replies with one chunk matching 
the request length and not mandate the status?

Best regards,

Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
Training and support from Colfax.
Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi
Nbd-general mailing list

Reply via email to