+1 -----Original Message----- From: ncc-services-wg <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Stream Service Sent: 28. syyskuuta 2018 0:08 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ncc-services-wg] 2018-05 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Legal Address of Internet Number Resource Holder)
Hello, I'm against this policy. Publishing the a number that refers to some local chamber of commerce registration is not a problem for me (if the resource holder is a company). However having an extra location to publish the address is something I'm against. Especially when the address/building is also the home of someone. If someone has a genuine right to obtain the address they will likely be able to get it anyway. Also in some cases the resource holder is a natural person. Please keep this in mind with any policy that is created. This policy greatly violates any privacy law that might apply. At least when the home address of someone is published. If it is a private person that is the resource holder publishing the address is also a privacy violation I believe. Now about the rationale: > To make it more difficult for malicious actors to hijack block of IP addresses and therefore play a preventive role in protecting the community against malicious actors I don't believe this to be true. The only thing that really helps against malicious actors are technical actions that can be taken by networks to prevent accepting any routes that are not good. RPKI might help and other options might exist or can be created in the future when there is a problem. A non-technical solution will not help in this situation. > Competent authorities to serve legal process to the party responsible for the resources There are already legal options to get the relevant information and to contact the resource holder. No change for this is required to make it possible. > To reduce delays in serving legal process, avoid lost leads and evidence A better option for this is to look into the legal process and try to speed that up in general. This doesn't help for it. In short: I'm strongly against the policy. Regards, Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: ncc-services-wg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Marco Schmidt > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 15:11 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [ncc-services-wg] 2018-05 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Legal > Address of Internet Number Resource Holder) > > Dear colleagues, > > A new RIPE Policy proposal, 2018-05, "Publication of Legal Address of > Internet Number Resource Holder", is now available for discussion. > > The goal of the proposal is for the RIPE NCC to publish the validated > legal address information of holders of Internet number resources. > > You can find the full proposal at: > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2018-05 > > As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this > four-week Discussion Phase is to discuss the proposal and provide > feedback to the proposer. > > At the end of the Discussion Phase, the proposer, with the agreement of > the RIPE Working Group Chairs, decides how to proceed with the proposal. > > We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to > <[email protected]> before 26 October 2018. > > Kind regards, > > Marco Schmidt > Policy Officer > RIPE NCC > > Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum
