Hi All,
while protecting resources and it's holders is very important in
distress areas, I have to remind you that Ukraine is a way not a
democratic country.
If we want really protect resources and holders, we have to avoid any
interaction with Ukrainian government in any way. In the practice,
"Review of requests by national governments" means you will have to pay
a huge bribe to get a letter of authorization from the government. They
all understand good the price of transfers... Sorry, it is sad, but true.
Any other options are good. The best for me is a "freeze button".
Also it is good to allow transfers only from the territories not in
distress, so company/person should move the legal address to the clear
area. It is quite easy, and is similar than what is doing now. But any
push from RIPE NCC to move to the "distress area", i.e. re-registration
on the occupied territory by the "laws" existing there is unacceptable.
14.10.22 17:47, Athina Fragkouli пише:
Dear colleagues,
We have recently seen people raising concerns about the risk of
illegitimate registry update requests in Ukraine being submitted to the
RIPE NCC. We have published an article on RIPE Labs that explains what
we have been doing to minimise this risk so far and looks at some
additional measures we could implement:
https://labs.ripe.net/author/athina/protecting-resource-holders-in-distressed-areas/
<https://labs.ripe.net/author/athina/protecting-resource-holders-in-distressed-areas/>
We will also be presenting on this topic in the RIPE NCC Services
Working Group at RIPE 85. We are interested in hearing any feedback or
suggestions from the RIPE community on this issue.
Regards,
Athina Fragkouli
Chief Legal Officer
RIPE NCC
--
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your
subscription options, please visit:
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ncc-services-wg
