as long as the PI holders can change the sponsoring LIR, I think that is fine.
Arash On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 at 13:15, Olha Sira <[email protected]> wrote: > I think also that it is a bad idea to let a LIR push the Transfer Lock > button on behalf of PI holders. > > On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 at 21:47, Max Tulyev <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> 03.06.23 18:44, Михайло Кононихін пише: >> > There are 24 mentions of the phrase "resource holder". Doesn't it mean >> > any resource holder, not just LIRs? I believe it includes organizations >> > with PI. >> >> I agree. >> But I don't see the way how it (will be) implemented technically. >> >> I think let LIRs be able to push the button for PI holders is a bad idea. >> > > > >> >> > >> > BTW, PI resources are easier to protect: you can transfer them to any >> > organization, don't need LIR. Transfer locks for 2 years. >> > >> Yes, a bit easier. You don't need a LIR for receiving company. >> >> -- >> >> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change >> your subscription options, please visit: >> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ncc-services-wg >> > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change > your subscription options, please visit: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ncc-services-wg >
-- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ncc-services-wg
