Dear Ed,
Thanks for your clarification and a copy of revised "An overview of the
current Approval for the Russian Federation", Issue 2.
Let us not forget that NEBS documents specify set of requirements
(occasionally procedures)and refer to applicable US testing standards not
necessarily harmonized with international standards.
Vitaly Gorodetsky
The suitability of this information for making decision is solely with the
reader
-----Original Message-----
From: Edward Fitzgerald [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 2:30 AM
To: 'Gorodetsky, Vitaly'; 'Dave Wilson'; '[email protected]';
'[email protected]'; '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: ETSI standards vs NEBS
Dear Dave / Vitaly,
In general terms throughout Europe (West [EU] - Central - East
[incl.
CIS]) the ETS 300 019/119 series tends to take precedence [over
NEBS]
where required by customers (e.g. Network Operators).
There are no regulatory requirements in the EU and strictly speaking
there are only environmental & reliability requirements to be met
for
the Russian Federation's Elektrosviaz (Telecom) Certification.
As US manufacturers tend only to test for NEBS, I have had to use
the
relevant NEBS or HALT test reports to support the TT&C [Technical
Terms
& Conditions] document presented to the State Committee. In terms
of
test reports demonstrating compliance with Safety and EMC, NEBS
reports
would not be accepted albeit that they are now closely aligned with
International standards.
Best regards,
Edward Fitzgerald
Director
Direct Tel. : +44 1202 20 09 22
Mobile Tel. : +44 7768 53 31 00
European Technology Services (EMEA)
Specialist Global Compliance and Regulatory Consultancy
Regional/Associate Offices in Australia, Canada, Russian Federation
and
the UK.
GLOBAL INtelLIGENCE Site < http://www.ets-tele.com > pssst ...
spread
the word
-----Original Message-----
From: Gorodetsky, Vitaly [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 1:01 AM
To: 'Dave Wilson'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
'[email protected]'
Subject: RE: ETSI standards vs NEBS
Dave,
I am quite familiar with LONIIS (in St. Petersburg) and I am rather
surprised. Typically, GOST-R mark would be satisfactory. LONIIS is
one
of
Russia Telecom Certification Centers. NEBS has nothing to do with
homologation and LONIIS's scope of evaluation, as I see it. Did
they
take
NEBS tests results as a substitute for all other relevant safety and
EMC
tests?
Could you elaborate?
Thanks,
Vitaly Gorodetsky
Compliance Engineer Direct: (818) 678-3840
The suitability of this information for making decision is solely
with
the
reader
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Wilson [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 1:45 PM
To: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
'[email protected]'
Subject: ETSI standards vs NEBS
Does anyone have a feel for the degree of acceptance of
GR-63/1089
in
Europe? I can remember at a previous company we got LONIIS
in
Russia
to
accept NEBS test results with minimal additional assessment
against
ETS 300
019/119.
Anyone else have any stories to tell, other than the obvious
spatial
differences?
Thanks,
Dave Wilson
Alidian Networks
-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
[email protected]
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
Michael Garretson: [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [email protected]
-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
[email protected]
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
Michael Garretson: [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [email protected]
