Stick with the Nebula version. I think my comment of "reopened development" greatly overshadowed my comment on experimenting with other widgets and core components. The Nebula CDateTime is currently the exact same thing it was last week, except that in a couple weeks some of the SF based experiments will stabilize and be brought over. Naturally, before doing so there will be discussion of anything that may impact customers (such as API changes) and we'll make sure that all IP is in order. I'll follow up with more when I have time (probably over the weekend) and once Peter and I have discussed it further, but overall rest assured that Nebula is where the you'll find the production release of CDateTime, and I am not planning on changing that.
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 3:32 AM, Tom Schindl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to have this is a seperate thread not bound to the project state > and making nebula more attractive discussion. > > I have to make a descision which widget we I choose for my customers > standard date implementation. Which one do you Peter and/or Jeremey suggest? > If I read Peter's mail correctly I should go with the one from SF. > > Tom > _______________________________________________ > nebula-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev >
_______________________________________________ nebula-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev
