Hi Tom, Looks good for me.
Just a few things : - "Please send all feedback to the eclipse.ufacekit newsgroup." -> should be the nebula newsgroup, correct ? - The process for stable widgets may not be totally clear. Does a widget that is no longer in incubation and can't follow the release schedule have to get out of Nebula and have an eclipse projet on its own ? "3. Creating a project for every widget who doesn't want to get part of the incubator nor staying in the Nebula-Project whose committers agree on a release schedule." Thanks for your work on this proposal. -- Nicolas On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Tom Schindl <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Nebula-Committers, > > It took longer than I estimated but I finally found some minutes on the > weekend working on the Nebula-Project proposal draft which should help > us getting out of the lock situation we are currently in. > > Comments and feedback naturally welcome or rather expected because it > directly affects you as the widget developers. The difference between > the last discussed idea and the one outlined in the project proposal is > that it's *NOT* a must for a widget to get a project on itsown but it > can also reside into the Nebula where we are going to define a release > schedule for 1.0 release. > > I more or less decided on the project I'm more or less the maintainer > (Grid,PShelf,PGroup) to let them stay into Nebula and do a 1.0 sometime > later *this* year. > > Tom > > _______________________________________________ > nebula-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev > > -- Nicolas Richeton
_______________________________________________ nebula-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev
