On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Matthew Hall <[email protected]>wrote:
> I'm please to announce that the EMO approved the PaperClips project this > morning! Congrats, I saw the CQ come in too! :) > The standing convention in nebula for bundle and java package names is > org.eclipse.nebula.widgets.[project_name] but this would be a misnomer for > PaperClips core since it doesn't have widgets. I have tentatively selected > these bundle/package names: > org.eclipse.nebula.paperclips (core) > org.eclipse.nebula.paperclips.widgets (ui) > > This wouldn't be a big deal except that CVS is pretty unfriendly to moving > files around and especially renaming modules, so I'd like to get this topic > nailed down before I check the code in. Is everybody okay with these names, > or is there a better option? > This seems completely reasonable to me. You may want to consider using 'org.eclipse.nebula.paperclips.core' if the first package is completely "headless" Cheers, -- Chris Aniszczyk | EclipseSource Austin | +1 860 839 2465 http://twitter.com/eclipsesource | http://twitter.com/caniszczyk
_______________________________________________ nebula-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev
