> Nightly *was* a standard word in the Eclipse community, it reminds me the
> time when people could not poll SCM and before continuous integration
> existed, and everyone used PDE/Build... That's now a freaky word for me: a
> project that only builds once a night is not healthy.
> Latest is interesting, but latest what? latest release, latest test
> build...? It is not precise enough I think.
>
> I could advocate for Snapshots for years, we probably need more opinions
> rather than debating for weeks just the 2 of us ;)
>

How about "continuous" then.

> We could also include some eclipse release name. (indigo/helios)
>
> Hopefully we will provide builds that would work with 3.5 and later.
> Binding a build to the name of a release will make people think that the
> release is a requirement for installation.
>

Yes, but at some point this will no longer work. Because it is a matter of
time before people start using touch API and/or restyling and other stuff
that will break compatibility with older SWT releases.

 I also want to think about things as long term support (LTS) where we must
be able to fix Nebula bugs against older versions of Eclipse (but that is a
separate discussion).
_______________________________________________
nebula-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev

Reply via email to