Hi Wim, No Paperclips is not mine, never was, I just wrote a big article on it back in the day. I believe it's self-hosted here: http://code.google.com/p/swt-paperclips/
Cheers, Emil On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Wim Jongman <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Emil, > > You also have the paperclips widget. Is this still good ? > > Regards, > > Wim > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Emil Crumhorn <[email protected]>wrote: > >> First, "Donald Dunne" is listed for the CalendarCombo widget, which is >> wrong as it's my widget. More on this widget below. >> >> Personally, the GANTT widget is the only widget I would like to bring >> forward and further as far as development goes. The Collapsible Buttons >> widget is fine as it is, it doesn't need more features nor does it really >> have issues apart from people having a bit of a hard time making it work as >> intended (as it needs to be "pushed" into place GUI-wise). I consider it >> stable but I don't think many people use it. As far as some recent issues >> reported with the GANTT chart, most open bugs are requests for new >> features. >> >> CalendarCombo has been getting more and more troublesome across platforms >> as more and more platforms change their API. Especially OS/X (and Linux) >> has been an issue lately causing the combo not to work at all, so it can >> either stay where it is or get dropped from Nebula as it has a very hard >> time to follow the "cross-platformness" of SWT widgets in general and >> despite my best attempts there's no way of making it work without (A). The >> widget stealing focus (not stealing focus was the whole point of the widget >> in the first place) or (B) Using native API calls. It's a very old widget >> so perhaps it's better that way as it clearly can't keep up. If it's ok for >> it to live as a Windows-only widget then it can also stay where it is. >> >> Hope that clears up my widgets and the status of them. >> >> Emil >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Tom Schindl <[email protected] >> > wrote: >> >>> Ok - to clarify. I expect all the listed committers from >>> Nebula-Components to respond to this mail and in case they don't the >>> widget will not get part of Nebula but stays in Nebula-Incubation. >>> >>> The only exception is that another committer raises his voice and fills >>> the gap by stating he/she will take care of the widget. >>> >>> I know that this process still does not guarantee that we'll not have >>> maintance problems in future - but I think we don't request too much by >>> simply requiring the committers to respond to this mail. >>> >>> I would also expect the Nebula-Incubator committers respond. >>> >>> Tom >>> >>> Am 13.02.12 14:02, schrieb Wim Jongman: >>> > I assume you mean the committers from the proposed incubator project? >>> > >>> > Regards, >>> > >>> > Wim >>> > >>> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Tom Schindl >>> > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > Hi Wim, >>> > >>> > looks good for me - one minor thing: it is PShelf/PGroup and not >>> > Pshelf/Pgroup. >>> > >>> > I'd also say people who don't respond to this draft should removed >>> from >>> > the committer list - if we find some other maintainer we'll carry >>> the >>> > widget with us, if not we'll leave it in the incubator. >>> > >>> > Tom >>> > >>> > Am 12.02.12 19:52, schrieb Wim Jongman: >>> > > Hi Guys, >>> > > >>> > > Please take some time to read the project proposal for the Nebula >>> > > restructuring. >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> http://wiki.eclipse.org/Nebula/restructure#Nebula_Project_Restructuring_Proposal >>> > > >>> > > It is mostly based on the original draft by Tom. >>> > > >>> > > I am looking forward to your comments and amendments. >>> > > >>> > > Regards, >>> > > >>> > > Wim >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > _______________________________________________ >>> > > nebula-dev mailing list >>> > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > B e s t S o l u t i o n . a t EDV >>> Systemhaus GmbH >>> > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> > tom schindl geschäftsführer/CEO >>> > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> > eduard-bodem-gasse 5-7/1 A-6020 innsbruck fax ++43 512 >>> > 935833 <tel:%2B%2B43%20512%20935833> >>> > http://www.BestSolution.at phone ++43 512 >>> > 935834 <tel:%2B%2B43%20512%20935834> >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > nebula-dev mailing list >>> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > nebula-dev mailing list >>> > [email protected] >>> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev >>> >>> >>> -- >>> B e s t S o l u t i o n . a t EDV Systemhaus GmbH >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> tom schindl geschäftsführer/CEO >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> eduard-bodem-gasse 5-7/1 A-6020 innsbruck fax ++43 512 935833 >>> http://www.BestSolution.at phone ++43 512 935834 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> nebula-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> nebula-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > nebula-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev > >
_______________________________________________ nebula-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev
