Hi Stephan, Luckily we have a legal department at the EMO (Eclipse Management Organization). You ask because you have already released it under the LGPL. I am not sure what the best way is of moving the license to EPL but our friends at legal will help us for sure.
The best thing to do is to file a bug, attach the source code and we will set the wheels in motion. All legal stuff and questions can be dealt during this process. Legal is very responsive when we are in the process. Some info: [1] http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/ip-process-in-cartoons.php [2] http://www.eclipse.org/legal/ (contains an EPL FAQ) Regards, Wim On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Stepan Rutz <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Wim / Tim / World, > > thanks for the positive feedback. > > What is your recommendation concerning the license? should i go and dual > license LGPL and EPL or is that just causing confusion and issues? I want > to contribute, so i want to use whatever works best in the Eclipse-world. > Single EPL or about anything else is fine to me as well. > > I will adapt the source code to fit into the Nebula structure and layout, > which is just fine of course. Also I will maintain an initial version, FAQ > and more complete javadocs. I am just really ready to tackle issues like > reverse geo-coding, layering etc, which are related but not necessarily a > good choice if you want to contribute a simple map-widget, rather than a > full blown map-kit. I will address such common questions a short FAQ > though. > > Waiting on a recommendation about licensing now (dual vs. single or > others). > > Regards, > Stepan > > Am 20.03.2012 um 13:32 schrieb Wim Jongman: > > Hi Stephan, > > I have looked at the webstart example. *Cool stuff !!* > > >> I am not sure to what extend I will be able to support/maintain it, but >> certainly I would be available for some basic stuff. >> > > We cannot accept code that is not being maintained. I hope you understand. > You need to maintain it at least until it becomes stable. We do have an > incubation area where widgets like yours can mature. > > I will go through the contribution questionnaire once a login or some >> other means is provided. >> >> You must create an eclipse account [1] and then file a bug against Nebula > core and attach your source code to the bug. Please take this bug [2] as an > example. > > >> I can confirm that I am the sole creator of the code (based on my own >> Swing Version of MapPanel) and there is no pending legal or copyright >> issues whatsoever. All necessary permissions (EPL etc) would be granted to >> the Nebula project if you are interested. I certainly would appreciate it >> if you could share it with others. >> > > This text needs to go into the bug. > > >> The Tiles-Data still must come from some tile-server, the defaults have >> their own usage conditions, but everything has to stay in reasonable >> bounds. (e.g. no world downloads for offline iPhone map-browsing and the >> like). Since MapWidget does some caching its use of Tiles is fair. >> > > Getting a subscription on a tile server is something between the user and > the provider of the tile server, right? > > Please see the contribution page on our wiki for the complete overview of > steps needed to get your widget in Nebula [3] > > > > [1] https://dev.eclipse.org/site_login/createaccount.php > [2] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=365948 > [3] http://wiki.eclipse.org/Nebula/New_Contributions > > Best regards, > > Wim > > _______________________________________________ > nebula-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > nebula-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev > >
_______________________________________________ nebula-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev
