Thanks Tom, I think time is a problem for most of us. However, if the API is mature and has been field tested as much as these then I am not worried to include them. In addition to the payment issue, which I think is a good model, we could also configure Gerrit to enable contributions from users.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Tom Schindl <[email protected]>wrote: > From an API and stability point of view > > PGroup +1 > Grid +1 > PShelf +1 > > My personal problem is that I don't have enough time to maintain them, > fix bugs and implement new features unless a customer shows up and pays > for them. > > Tom > > On 31.07.13 12:43, Wim Jongman wrote: > > Hi People, > > > > We have various requests for an official Nebula release. Do we still > > want to go ahead with this or do we want to stay a perpetual incubator? > > Please discuss. > > > > I am ready to go ahead with this but I need help. Please provide a +1 > > and your widget name if you want to release your widget into the > > release. If you do not vote +1 then your widget is not included. > > > > The rules for releases are here [1] > > > > Regards, > > > > Wim > > > > [2] > http://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Release_Reviews#What_are_the_Requirements.3F > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > nebula-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > nebula-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev >
_______________________________________________ nebula-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev
