--- Nicolas Cannasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't followed Harmony recently. But what would > be the difference > with haXe ? No technical reason that I know. This would be a license issue only. > I'm not sure what are your goals. If you want to use > haXe, maybe adding > a haXe-2-Java generator and running haXe on the JVM > might be a simpler > approach. No, I am only interested in using the Neko VM. If Neko had Classpath, wither Java? > then maybe you should focus on only a small subparts > of GNU Classpath > that don't require "native" code, and add some > "native" classes > (FileSystem, Network, ...) by rewrapping by-hand the Yes, JNI parts would have to been thrown out and done by hand the haXe and Neko way. No AWT or Swing parts will be implemented aside from some "headless" parts that might be needed for image rendering. Everything else, is on the table. Yes, this will be a massive project. It will be a big deal for haXe development. Thanks, Richard __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- Neko : One VM to run them all (http://nekovm.org)
