Oops, Im getting confused between haxe and neko. there is binary for neko, but not haxe.
my bad. Hank On 6/14/06, Alex Drahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> There is already a 1.3 OSX release so maybe not needed right now. >> > > uh... I think it is needed. The OSX version did *not* compile... out > of the box. In fact the make file wasnt even set with MACOSX (or > whatever the variable is) = 1. > > And particularly if there is some cleaner way of dealing with boehm, > which I couldnt get to compile without darwinports (which puts the > files in a different place than neko expects them) then that would be > great too. > > I just think getting installers to be exactly right is really > important. leaving the last little bit of the install as an "exercise > for the reader" is not newbie friendly. > > Hank Right now, we are talking about the binary distribution, not the source one. My package is a binary, statically linked with boehm gc and it even shows neko's logo during installation, very newbie friendly ;-) Alex -- Neko : One VM to run them all (http://nekovm.org)
-- Neko : One VM to run them all (http://nekovm.org)
