Hi, Echoing Jens's comment: it'd be nice to have more traditional and OS-friendly way to install neko and its components. We should have rpm and debian packages I believe. We have them already for Fedora and Debian (correct?), but tora is missing there, so I vote for it to be added more or less the way Jens suggests. Haxelib is great for development, but no so nice for configuring the production servers: for instance, when there is a security fix for mysql client applied, you normally want to propagate that into neko-mysql which requires a rpm/debian package with dependencies and all of it, and haxelib is not of much help here.
Just my 2 cents.. Mike -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jens Peter Secher Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 11:53 AM To: Neko intermediate language mailing list Subject: Re: [Neko] Neko 1.8.1 Released ! 2009/7/29 Nicolas Cannasse <[email protected]>: > Jens Peter Secher a écrit : >> Any suggestions (Michael Pliskin?) on how I should distribute the >> various parts of Tora? Right now the Debian package only includes >> mod_tora2.ndll, but how would you ideally like it to be packaged? > > That's fine this way. People can download the tora haxelib package to get > the server : OK. I was just thinking: If I were to convince a Service Provider that she should allow me to run Tora on one of her machines, it would be far easier if I could tell her to just do sudo aptittude install libapache2_mod_tora sudo /etc/init.d/apache2 restart With haxelib one will have to install haXe download, compile, etc. to build Tora for her. Cheers, -- Jens Peter Secher. _DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_. A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad? -- Neko : One VM to run them all (http://nekovm.org)
-- Neko : One VM to run them all (http://nekovm.org)
